Can you get it?

I was reading a blog site where the commenters are allowed to make attacks. The author of the site feels it makes livelier discussion. She has one commenter who is hateful and who said, “REBORN Christians are the dumbest kind of Christian.” I chuckled and could not wait to read the answer farther down the page.

I kept reading, hoping someone would get to it. No one ever did.

Not wanting to hijack her site, I’ve come over here to get a few things straight.

  1. Reborn Christians are the ONLY Christians. Get that? Don’t we have it from the mouth of the Christ, Himself, that we must be reborn? Am I missing something here?
  2. The word “Christian” means “follower of Christ” or “believer in Christ”. Someone who has no idea what Christ taught could hardly claim to be a Christian. He might be a believer, saved, and even born again, but tell me, what does the word “Christian” mean? — “Follower of Christ.”


English: Dead Sea Scroll - part of Isaiah Scro...
Dead Sea Scroll – part of Isaiah Scroll (Isa 57:17 – 59:9), 1QIsa b (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

There were hateful things said about the Bible, too. (Imagine denigrating the Koran!)

All the old-fashioned objections to the Bible were obliterated when they found the Dead Sea Scrolls. Although these scrolls were the most astounding and faith-building archaeological find EVER, the fact of this find was carefully hidden from the public.


Because they decimated all the old-fashioned arguments against the veracity of the Word.

What was it about them, you ask?

Well, these scrolls were merely ancient, ancient copies of the Bible and had been hidden from enemies for centuries, sealed in jars in caves. What

Qumran in the West Bank, Middle East. In this ...
Qumran in the West Bank, Middle East. In this cave the Dead Sea Scrolls were found. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

they found was that while these hand-made copies were hiding, the act of copying was continuing to this day, and, lo and behold, there were hardly any discrepancies!

Only one-tenth percent was different.

If we realize how carefully the copyists made sure they copied it right, we would realize how seriously they believed in the absolute importance of getting this right.

For instance, they could not even be considered for the copying job unless they could recite the entirety of the Holy Writ, WITHOUT MISTAKE. A boy began memorizing as soon as possible and worked a large portion of his life to EARN the privilege of being a copyist. Then, once a section was completed, it was read by others who also had it all memorized both ways. It was read both ways to find mistakes. If one mistake was found, it was thrown away.


They cared a LOT more than the villains who throw up complaints in blog comments, misspelled and full of typos.

And as for objections to retranslation, from time to time, the very argument that so many bring up, that word meanings change, is the very reason we MUST redo the work from time to time.


Furthermore–King James did not translate: He hired the most brilliant verbal thinkers of his day to do the work. A very large team of brilliance, some experts in ancient Greek or Hebrew, others experts in the current usage of English. And considering the fact that until then, similar villains would kill anyone who tried to give the English-speaking public a copy of the Word in their own language, this was a huge GIFT.

NOT something to be spit upon.

It is true that the Word is alive and active. It breathes and acts. It speaks. It’s a little like the mystery of holding a conch to the ear and hearing the entire ocean from which it came. The Word contains, indeed, in a way, it IS, the God from which it came. It embodies Him in a unique way, noticed not only by us, but also by the writers of it, when they said it is living and active and able to separate a person’s motives from what he THINKS his motives are. I love that about it. I can read along, thinking I am so sweet and good, and then bang. Right between the eyes. I’m human again. Yay God!

Okay. Now. The Ark. Villains attack the Ark, too.

  1. Noah did not have to gather the animals. The Word says God brought them to him.
  2. He did not bring two of every variety, just two of every kind. Two dogs, period. Two cats, period. We must remember the gene pool was much better back then. MUCH better.
  3. The Word does not say they were adult versions. Very young animals would not have exhibited animosity, as we see from stories of kittens and puppies that grow up together. Also, they would not have needed as much food or litter, nor taken up as much space, nor given off as much stench, and likely would not have feared water nor grown seasick, nor gotten pregnant. Also, they would have slept more.

If we WANT to believe, it is simple to see how it could be done.

Also, go figure: The thing was huge. Like a football field.

There was more I wanted to say, but my eyes are getting bleary. Go to my posts on this topic that begin here.

Do you ever encounter non-Christians in sheep’s clothing? How do you deal with them?

Published by Katharine

Katharine is a writer, speaker, women's counselor, and professional mom. Happily married over 50 years to the same gorgeous guy. She loves cooking amazing homegrown food, celebrating grandbabies, her golden-egg-laying hennies, and watching old movies with popcorn. Her writing appears at Medium, Arkansas Women Bloggers, Contently, The Testimony Train, Taste Arkansas, Only in Arkansas, and in several professional magazines and one anthology.

19 thoughts on “Can you get it?

  1. When Jesus was being tempted by the devil – He responded each time with Scripture. That’s what we do – sometimes even devoting an entire post, chock-full of Scripture, as a rebuttal. Fantastic article Katherine!

  2. Hey There 🙂

    After spending years debating religious themes on the web [forums etc], I made the decisions to cease any arguments/debates or anything similar. There are so many opinions, so many interpretations, that I realised all I was actually doing was wasting my time and the time of others.

    I’m not suggesting that you or anyone else should avoid these discussions, but, for me, they proved fruitless/irritating/frustrating and I learned that my time was perhaps better spent by focussing on other things.

    Much love, Mike.

    1. Well, your time is CERTAINLY well-spent where you are. 🙂

      I know what you mean, and I tend to shrink from the arguing type, one other reason I did not post on the site I mentioned: It seemed as if folks were just having fun tossing sacred things around. Having fun arguing is not good.

      Gaining understanding from intelligent discussion is good.

      Knowing the difference is wisdom. 🙂

  3. I have a strict rule of never reading the comments on most blogs. I just don’t, because I would have an inordinate desire to throw pearls before swine/trolls.

      1. I wouldn’t “act up,” I would be sincerely trying to convince trolls who aren’t interested in intelligent debate, but trying to suck me into a quarrel. 😀

        I’m as well-behaved as they come. 😉

  4. I love your passion!

    Like you, I don’t argue on blogs; it makes me feel unpleasant, and that’s not how I want to feel. There’s enough of that in the actual world.

    There’s nothing wrong with reasoned debate (God made us reasoning creatures, after all), but reason so often disappears as soon as someone disagrees with someone else in the blogosphere.

    1. Absolutely true.
      And that is the joy of blogging–I can silence the unreasonable ones! 😉
      Only had to do that one time ever, but it was such a good thing to be able.

      Thanks for stopping by and AGREEING! 😉

Comment! Because we want to know what you think!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.